The use of Aramaic is not a valid indication of date and may be accounted for by the northern origin of the Shulammite ( Song.6.13). ![]() In view of the extensive commerce and widespread diplomatic relations of Solomon, the presence of foreign terms, especially for articles imparted or imitated from foreign sources, is to be expected. On the other hand, it has been pointed out that these usages are not inconsistent with authorship by Solomon. The frequent use of Aramaic forms and words, the presence of names of foreign products, a Persian word, and a Greek word are taken as evidence for a late date. Pfeiffer concludes that the Song of Songs is “an anthology of erotic poems,” of about 250 b.c., using the language as the sole criterion for the date. There is considerable range of opinion as to the authorship and date of the book. ![]() It also provides the basis for the older title of the book in English versions, “Song of Solomon,” as well as for the title in the NIV, “Song of Songs.” The Hebrew name, “Song of Songs,” is taken from 1:1, which introduces the book as “the song of songs which is Solomon’s.” This use of the Hebrew superlative declares the book the best of the 1,005 songs of Solomon ( 1Kgs.4.32), or perhaps the greatest of all songs. This is unique among biblical books, for it centers in the joys and distresses of the love relationship between a man and a woman.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |